There are two types of conversations about work:
The first is a Friday evening conversation. It is best held at about 5pm in the pub just around the corner from the office in hushed tones.
The first conversation discusses who:
- Who screwed up
- Who is on the way up
- Who is on the way out
- And — in my younger years — who is sleeping with whom
This type of conversation is very satisfying. There is nothing like a little character assassination to round off your week. Unfortunately it never goes anywhere and does precisely nothing to improve performance.
The second conversation is about what not who:
The conversation asks:
- What is happening?
- Why is it happening?
- What did we learn?
- What are we going to do next?
This type of conversation is nowhere near as much fun, but it is a lot more rewarding. You just have to follow a couple of guidelines:
Conversational guidelines
- Hold the meeting in the workplace if you can, not a conference room. It will give context and cues
- Involve the same people — not too many
- Use a standing agenda
- Always discuss the same measures (if you keep changing them you will never get better)
- Make everything visual. Put the agenda, performance, issues and actions up on a wall. Make it clear
- Be honest about issues, talk about the evidence, do not offer excuses or cast blame
- Don’t problem solve, do that later, keep the session short and punchy.
- Create action. Who is going to do what?
- Check the actions, did you do what you said you would, if not, why not? Should the action change?
- Repeat the conversation religiously – once per day, once per week, once per month. Make the gap long enough for the actions to have happened but short enough to keep on-top of the issues
- Hold the conversation in the same place at the same time, then no one can forget
You will know the conversation is not going well if:
- People routinely turn up late. They are voting with their feet
- People turn up unprepared. They aren’t taking it seriously
- There is lots of good news and few problems. People are scared to tell the truth
- The energy is low. People are positioning and telling tales, not getting to the point and addressing it
- Issues aren’t being resolved. Why attend a meeting that is simply a talking shop?
Most important of all…
Remember that this is a conversation about what not who. “Who caused that?” and “What caused that?” might sound the same, but the responses you will get are a million miles apart.
The who is always best talked about in the pub.
Rule 18: Discuss the work
If you enjoyed this post click here to have the next delivered straight to your inbox
Read another opinion
Image by Hamed Parham
Annette Franz says
Unfortunately, I believer type #1 happens more often than type #2.
James Lawther says
I’m probably a little guilty of that myself Annette
Adrian Swinscoe says
Hi James,
I wonder how much discussion went into Toyota’s new system:
http://dailykanban.com/2015/03/toyotas-tnga-tps-2-0/
I assume discussion will be an ongoing and integral part of the process too.
Adrian
James Lawther says
Thanks for the link Adrian, right up my street